Skip to main content

Who deserves the AI-thorship for artwork?

Weekend Reads

Technology in Perspective
12.02.23 | AI Artists

Advances in artificial intelligence have led many to speculate that human beings will soon be replaced by machines in every domain, including that of creativity. AI-generated art poses tricky legal questions. Who should be recognized for the artwork? And more broadly, when an algorithm is used to create a piece of art, who owns it—the person who wrote the algorithm, or the person who put it to that specific purpose? Suffice it to say, there are a lot of things still to be worked out in the world of AI-powered artistry.

Plus, last chance to subscribe and save 50% to access MIT Technology Review's essential technology news, expert insights, and emerging trends.
50% off all access
50% off all access
50% off all access

🔥 LAST CHANCE: SAVE 50%
Save 50% on an annual subscription to MIT Technology Review and gain access to expert insight that you can't get anywhere else. Don't miss out, claim this offer now!

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE 50%

Was this newsletter forwarded to you, and you'd like to see more?

Sign up today →
LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
View in browser | This email was sent to manojdole1.InformationTech@blogger.com.

Manage your preferences | Unsubscribe | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

MIT Technology Review · 196 Broadway, 3rd fl, · Cambridge, MA 02139 · USA

Copyright © 2023 MIT Technology Review, All rights reserved.

Opt out of all promotional emails and newsletters from MIT Technology Review

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Startups Weekly: Trouble in EV land and Peloton is circling the drain

Plus: The quirky rabbit R1 and Tesla's relationship with lidar View this email online in your browser ...

US investigates Fisker Ocean again, this time for braking randomly

U.S. regulators have opened their FOURTH probe of Fisker's Ocean SUV View this email online in your browser ...

How three filmmakers created Sora’s latest stunning videos

What's next for generative video ...