Three things to know about the White House’s executive order on AI

People shouldn't pay such a high price for calling out AI harms

In partnership with  Oracle+Deloitte Subscribe for $8/month The Download Your daily dose of what's up in emerging technology By Rhiannon Williams • 10.31.23 Hello, and happy Halloween, if you're celebrating! 🎃 🕸️ 🦇 Today: what you need to know about the US government's new AI rules. Plus: why AI activists often end up paying a high price for calling out harms. Three things to know about the White House's executive order on AI The US has set out its most sweeping set of AI rules and guidelines yet in an executive order issued by President Joe Biden yesterday. The order will require more transparency from AI companies about how their models work and will establish a raft of new standards, most notably for labeling AI-generated content. Although the executive order advances the voluntary requirements for AI policy that the White House set back in August, it lacks specifics on how the rules will be enforced. It has also divided AI experts over whether it goes far enough to protect people against AI's immediate harms. Read our story to find out the three most important things you need to know about the executive order and the impact it could have.   —Tate Ryan-Mosley & Melissa Heikkilä   This story is part of MIT Technology Review Explains, our series untangling the complex, messy world of technology to help you understand what's coming next. You can read more from the series here. People shouldn't pay such a high price for calling out AI harms People who point out problems caused by AI systems often face aggressive criticism online, as well as pushback from their employers. In a recent interview, renowned AI activist and researcher Joy Buolamwini described having to fend off public attacks on her research from one of the most powerful technology companies in the world: Amazon. When Buolamwini was first starting out, she had to convince people that AI was worth worrying about. Now, people are more aware that AI systems can be biased and harmful. That's the good news. The bad news is that speaking up against powerful technology companies still carries risks. That is a shame. The voices trying to shift the Overton window on what kinds of risks are being discussed and regulated are growing louder than ever. If the culture around AI actively silences other voices, that comes at a price to us all. Read the full story. —Melissa Heikkilä This story is from The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter giving you the inside track on all things AI. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Monday. ADVERTISEMENT In partnership with  Oracle+Deloitte Leading retailers are launching highly personalized customer experiences in both digital and physical spaces, at scale. As customer expectations for highly personalized shopping experiences accelerate, organizations are poised to usher in a new era in retail enabled by AI innovations and the ongoing convergence of online and physical retail trends. Register now to watch the free webinar The must-reads I've combed the internet to find you today's most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology. 1 How generative AI is affecting the Israel-Hamas conflict Not as much as feared, so far. (Wired $) + Employees are being urged not to post about the war on social media. (NY Mag $) 2 US Congress is failing to protect kids online Experts are split over whether proposed policies would help. (The Atlantic $) + Child online safety laws will actually hurt kids, critics say. (MIT Technology Review)   3 The offshore wind industry is struggling It's a seriously costly business, and developers are increasingly wary. (FT $) + The wild new technology coming to offshore wind power. (MIT Technology Review) 4 X is worth less than half of what Elon Musk paid for it It's now worth around $19 billion, down from $44 billion a year ago. (NYT $) + Musk still believes he can boost its worth to $250 billion, though. (WSJ $) 5 The US government is suing SolarWinds The software company reportedly failed to disclose vulnerabilities that lead to it being hacked on numerous occasions. (WP $) + How Russian hackers infiltrated the US government for months without being spotted. (MIT Technology Review) 6 An internal rift is tearing Block apart And cofounder Jack Dorsey isn't intervening to smooth things over. (The Information $)   7 The clean energy revolution isn't good news for everyone Fossil fuel workers could lose their jobs, and the industry is ill-equipped to support them. (Vox)   8 Voice cloning clips of Narendra Modi are rife online The technology could bridge India's language barrier ahead of next year's election. (Rest of World)   9 Indie developers are making a killing from horror games The little guys have the freedom to revel in the truly macabre. (The Guardian) 10 The recent partial lunar eclipse was pretty spectacular 🌖 Onlookers in some countries were treated to a 'blood moon' too. (New Scientist $) Quote of the day "In terms of being behind the tech, the tech has had a bit of a head start." —Ben Buchanan, an advisor to the White House, admits that the US government is facing a real challenge in trying to legislate rapidly-evolving AI to Insider. The big story What happens when you donate your body to science October 2022 Rebecca George doesn't mind the vultures that complain from the trees that surround the Western Carolina University body farm. George studies human decomposition, and part of decomposing is becoming food. Scavengers are welcome. George, a forensic anthropologist, places the body of a donor in the Forensic Osteology Research Station—known as the FOREST. This is Enclosure One, where donors decompose naturally above ground. Nearby is Enclosure Two, where researchers study bodies that have been buried in soil. She is the facility's curator, and monitors the donors—sometimes for years—as they become nothing but bones. In the US, about 20,000 people or their families donate their bodies to scientific research and education each year. Whatever the reason, the decision becomes a gift. Western Carolina's FOREST is among the places where watchful caretakers know that the dead and the living are deeply connected, and the way you treat the first reflects how you treat the second. Read the full story. —Abby Ohlheiser We can still have nice things A place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or tweet 'em at me.) + The US's sole museum dedicated to ouija boards sounds terrifying—especially after dark. + I'm not convinced Sylvester Stallone or Arnold Schwarzenegger are going to win any pumpkin carving competitions. + Charles Darwin the tortoise has a novel way of opening a new university building. + If you're after a seriously scary horror film, you could do worse than check out this list. + Okay, that's enough ambience for one night. For a limited time, save 25% on an annual subscription to MIT Technology Review and gain access to our Hard Problems edition, which explores technology's role in solving the world's most pressing issues. SUBSCRIBE FOR $8/MONTH Register now. Two days of innovation and inspiration on the MIT campus. November 14-15, 2023. Top image credit: ANNA MONEYMAKER/GETTY IMAGES Please send nightmares to hi@technologyreview.com. Follow me on Twitter at @yannon_. Thanks for reading! —Rhiannon Was this newsletter forwarded to you, and you'd like to see more? Sign up today → View in browser | This email was sent to manojdole1.InformationTech@blogger.com. Manage your preferences | Unsubscribe | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy MIT Technology Review · 196 Broadway, 3rd fl, · Cambridge, MA 02139 · USA Copyright © 2023 MIT Technology Review, All rights reserved. Opt out of all promotional emails and newsletters from MIT Technology Review